![]() ![]() – New cheat: Raven can now ‘cheat’ and get all outfits after completing the last dungeon. Read the book in Raven’s library to find cheats for the game. – The ‘egg vibrator’ can now be seen from the front. – After reaching Level 11 of exhibithionism, Raven can now take off the top and bottom clothes. Get Raven completely surrounded by tentacles! Obtainable after going to the tentacle cave, in the mountains. ‘Someone’ will give it to Raven after the second time hanging out. (Requires having certain parameters activated) – Raven can now explore the deep forest after completing the last dungeon to find someone really close to her home… – New full scene: ? – New outfit: Xmas outfit! Obtainable after completing the last dungeon and searching under the christmas tree, in Raven’s home. Hosted by 44 Bytes.V1.3: – Raven can now walk Sai after adopting him. © 2023 Hookshot Media, partner of ReedPop. Join 1,421,322 people following Nintendo Life: Mailbox: The Future Of 3D Mario, Indie Sequels, Deadlines.Įvery American Football Game On Nintendo Switch Mini Review: Suika Game - Viral Sensation 'Watermelon Gam. Nintendo Accounts To "Help Ease" Next-Gen Transition, Acc. Retro-Inspired Indie Sea Of Stars Receives A New Switch U. So, to my original point, I'm a curious person and I wish I knew definitively how things happen so I'm not left the speculate reasonably but endlessly.ĥ0 Best Game Boy Color (GBC) Games Of All Timeīest Nintendo Switch Micro SD Cards - Cheapest Memory Car. Maybe Nintendo owns the distribution rights or something so they can't sell it on their own or Nintendo reserves the right to re-publish it free-to-play at their discretion so there's a potential conflict if they sell it for $1.99 or whatever or $0.99/year on their own because then Nintendo can decide to pull it out of the vault and undercut them. No one ever gets to play Super Mario 35 or Pac-Man 99 again cause some execs couldn't come up with a plan? I'd rather they made it free to play for some initial period and charged me a couple bucks after that than make the game completely unplayable. What's the plan? Why create joy for people just to take it away? Just a little short term profit. I know I answered my own question so let me rephrase. But how expensive could those services be? Nintendo must pay them a cut of NSO subscription dollars and that cut must be time-limited or otherwise insufficient to cover the cost of running the online services. Like, these are free to play games to the company is operating them at a loss. That's like one of the most basic tenants of game design, and Namco unfortunately dropped the ball.Īnyways, Pac-Man World Re-Pac 2. If there's nothing to grind for, why should I keep playing instead of moving on to something else? There's a GDC panel from like 2005 where Iwata talks at length about inscentivising players with consistent rewards. Pac-Man is every bit as well-known as Tetris is, so it could have been a smash hit if they managed it right, but nope. You can only do the same thing over and over again so many times without the incentive of rewards to keep you playing. You can't just release a f2p game, add no updates, and expect it to have legs. I enjoyed it quite a bit for the first couple weeks, but with all the unlockables being behind a paywall instead of being able to earn new themes by participating in special events or saving up tickets that can be redeemed like in Tetris 99, it just became pointless to keep playing. It was honestly a pretty fun game that could've had more longevity if they supported it with regular free content updates.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |